In the President’s Men Democrats Support Papua Separation Of Homeland

Ulil Abshar Abdlla
Papua issue would not be completed in the near future. It took a long process. That fact should be realized that all the political parties. Papua problem is not semata2 about economic justice. “The problem is, many people there feel they do not belong to Indonesia!” Said Ulil. “Like a marriage, if one spouse does not want lg survive within the bond of marriage, forced to cook hrs. Ulil Abshar Abdlla in Twiternya Account @ Ulil
Papua conflict lately sparked various opinions even a statement issued by various groups. Nothing wrong if come “perkeruh” conflict comes from the frontman of one of the democrat party pembinanya is the president of the Republic of Indonesia Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono.

PD officials this statement is a hot ball that has become a political party during this practice. What is the purpose statement of the sloping supporting Papuan independence let alone (apart from the Homeland). Obviously there is the intention of the Democratic bigwigs opinion.

Online site (itoday) launch status one senior Democrat who also figures liberal Islam network. “Do we still have to defend Papua? Why do not just let them go? Complicated! “, Ulil wrote in his Twitter account. He continued, “I used to think jg, Papua dg must be maintained at any price. But I felt my mind was really naive, “said Ulil. Why Papua should be freed, Ulil reasoned: “The cost of maintaining expensive Papua. Already then, done whatever the central government, will continue to be wrong. Tired! ”

Indonesian people sure know how public cynicism towards East Timor’s struggle for independence from Indonesia. After the referendum was held, emerging opinions from various circles. Some say if you keep East Timor useless because during the development of the country’s Tetum everything from state budget resources and no natural resources supply can in Timor Leste for the central government. The discourse could be the reason of looking at the problem Papuan Ulil as he had expressed.

In the view of Ulil, Like a marriage, if one spouse does not want lg survive within marriage, cooking should be forced, “And the problem in Papua is not to be completed in the near future. It took a long process. That fact should be aware of all the political parties. Papua issue is not merely a matter of economic justice. “The problem is, many people there feel they do not belong to Indonesia!” Said Ulil.

Problem Indonesian Papuan independence most people agree with Ulil, but handed over entirely to the government to solve it. Settlement of the problem in eclipsed by various forces and interests. Statesmen and clergy have each other’s views. Homeland nationalists certainly have a different view to the views of conservative nationalists.
Likewise one’s personal views from the mainstream of the party or institution in which the individual shelter. Papua in the eyes of the general officer ranks was a battle between the Republic of Indonesia to maintain a career and a lot of money.

Statement leader of the Liberal Islam Network (JIL), which later served as Chairman of the Strategy and Policy Development Centre Democrat Party, Ulil Abshar Abdalla who wants Papuan independence by Father Anselm’s just unfortunate Amo, who manyatakan Ulil not have to be like that. “No need to like it, existing policies, but searched the wrong, not war policy,” he said when interviewed itoday, Tuesday (19/6). For Father Anselm, Papua issue is not a matter simply let the problems in the sense of surrender and let go, but looking for solutions, not let the issue continues to drag on.

Romo Further, the emergence of violent and mysterious shootings in Papua Special Autonomy program due to failure (SAF) launched by the Central Government. Failure of the program was followed by violent approach by the government, giving rise to reactions and human rights violations. “As religious leaders, I do not want violence,” he said. Regarding the voices that continue to promote Papuan independence, Father Anselm is also the religious leaders in Papua assess attitudes that encourage independence is not the final solution to the problem that occurred in Papua. For him, independence of the Republic of Indonesia is unwarranted defeatism.

I think Ulil statement above does not resolve the problem, and the heat tends to throw the ball away. Even the dialogue between the government and the people of Papua is a recommendation Institute of Sciences (LIPI) and the Papua Peace Network (JDP) has failed miserably.
The problem is obvious, that the Jakarta (government) repeatedly use a weapon to silence Papuan aspirations, not by means of dialogue. The ongoing conflict in Papua fact that one way dialogue is basih. So there must be another way. That dialogue to find a “way” to solve the problem in Papua must mobilize, but very messy when the dialog is considered as a solution Completion Papua problem.

Since the 20th century (the era of the nation league nations) until the era of the United Nations, Papua has always been a matter of international political decisions. Starting from attractive boundary that divides the island into two countries economic concessions to the democratic process that gave birth to the world of suspended animation, human rights violations never to reveal. Then the process of resolving Papua was not just done through conversation alone but need a mature international consolidation.

Photo: The President’s Men in Democratic Support Papua Papua Conflict Separation Of Homeland lately sparked various opinions that even statements issued by various groups.

Nothing wrong if come “perkeruh” conflict comes from the frontman of one of the democrat party pembinanya is the president of the Republic of Indonesia Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono. PD officials this statement is a hot ball that has become a political party during this practice. What is the purpose statement of the sloping supporting Papuan independence let alone (apart from the Homeland).

Obviously there is the intention of the Democratic bigwigs opinion. Online site (itoday) launch status one senior Democrat who also figures liberal Islam network. “Do we still have to defend Papua? Why do not just let them go? Complicated! “, Ulil wrote in his Twitter account. He continued, “I used to think jg, Papua dg must be maintained at any price. But I felt my mind was really naive, ”

Connect Ulil. Why Papua should be freed, Ulil reasoned: “The cost of maintaining expensive Papua. Already then, done whatever the central government, will continue to be wrong. Tired! “Indonesian People definitely know how public cynicism towards East Timor’s struggle for independence from Indonesia.

After the referendum was held, emerging opinions from various circles. Some say if you keep East Timor useless because during the development of the country’s Tetum everything from state budget resources and no natural resources supply can in Timor Leste for the central government.

The discourse could be the reason of looking at the problem Papuan Ulil as he had expressed. In the view of Ulil, Like a marriage, if one spouse does not want lg survive within marriage, cooking should be forced, “And the problem in Papua is not to be completed in the near future.

It took a long process. That fact should be aware of all the political parties. Papua issue is not merely a matter of economic justice. “The problem is, many people there feel they do not belong to Indonesia!” Said Ulil.

Problem Indonesian Papuan independence most people agree with Ulil, but handed over entirely to the government to solve it. Settlement of the problem in eclipsed by various forces and interests. Statesmen and clergy have each other’s views. Homeland nationalists certainly have a different view to the views of conservative nationalists.

Likewise one’s personal views from the mainstream of the party or institution in which the individual shelter. Papua in the eyes of the general officer ranks was a battle between the Republic of Indonesia to maintain a career and a lot of money.

Statement leader of the Liberal Islam Network (JIL), which later served as Chairman of the Strategy and Policy Development Centre Democrat Party, Ulil Abshar Abdalla who wants Papuan independence by Father Anselm’s just unfortunate Amo, who manyatakan Ulil not have to be like that. “No need to like it, existing policies, but searched the wrong, not war policy,” he said when interviewed itoday.

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: