Questionable, Special Autonomy Law Basics Plus

GambarTaha: Pardon Prisoners / Merdeka Papuan political prisoners not Have Initiated by True

Taha AlhamidJAYAPURA-Plus Special Autonomy that carried the Governor and Deputy Governor of Papua Luke Enembe and Klemen Tinal (LUKMEN), among others, granting clemency from President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono to about 40-50 Prisoners-independence Papuan political prisoners are still undergoing legal in a number of prisons in the country Water scathing criticism of Secretary General of the Papua Presidium Council / PDP Taha Alhamid when Bintang Papua confirmed via email on Wednesday (29/5) night.
It is said Taha Alhamid, prevailing Autonomy in Papua since 2001, is the asymmetric decentralization based on Law No. 21 of 2001. As mandated in the Act itself, any changes must be made upon the recommendation of the Papuan people through the MRP and the DPRP.

“Well, if there is now a label Autonomy Plus, we question the legal basis for the policy, what? Law or just follow the political tastes of course. This country, were not permitted tastes run by individuals or political groups, but should be based on the law, “said Taha Alhamid.
Firstly, according to Taha Alhamid, the Government should explain to the public, on what legal basis was the emergence of Autonomy Plus. When proposed changes are made, the people of Papua are involved or not? and what is the substance of Autonomy Plus it?
“If massage plus-plus, I think a lot of people know, what a treat substance, then what’s Autonomy Plus. Honestly, we hear this word merely Autonomy Plus of course the media and political rhetoric. substance we are still blind, “he said.
Indeed, it is the fact that in 2008, added Taha Alhamid, indeed the Government has changed this with the release of the Special Autonomy Law Regulation No. 1 of 2008. Then came the Presidential Instruction No. 5 of 2007 on the acceleration of development in Papua is lying before the run, then appeared Unit to Accelerate Development in Papua and West Papua (UP4B) as an acceleration policy intervention, because the government realized how SAF has not effectively address the issue of Papua.
“Well if now suddenly there Autonomy Plus, this clearly a political move that makes people confused and asking questions. Government duty is to explain the direction and substance of the policy plus, “he said.
Second, Prisoners / Cs political prisoners Filep Karma rejected clemency offered. He said he felt this rejection very reasonable, especially because it was never properly initiated. In 1999, the Central Government then issued a release of all political prisoners-Papuan political prisoners. It is based on the demands of the people of Papua, not something that suddenly fall from the sky without a dignified political communication.
“For my friends, the pardon is forgiveness. That is, someone pleaded guilty, and was tried and convicted for their compassion and given the President for clemency or pardon, “Taha Alhamid Tutut.
“It is the prerogative of the President, but it is no mechanism. I think this, one of the psycho-political wedge. Legal experts and lawyers in Papua, I feel more competent to manage this problem. We have to get used to, submit a job to a professional. Because we are not able to wrench open all the nuts and bolts. “
Third, the government should be more open, if you want to give a plus to the Papua Special Autonomy, Why not just open the door for dialogue? “After all this time, the dialogue has become a point demands of the people. The road is even potentially answer many questions and much more elegant, “he said. (Mdc/don/l03)

1 Comment

  1. Reblogged this on NETERUM TELEBE.

    Like

%d bloggers like this: